|
20th September 2006: The news
that Bryan Robson had left West Bromwich Albion by "mutual
consent" on Monday morning has provoked mixed reactions in
the football world.
For many Baggies fans, it has later than they would have liked,
but earlier than they expected. A recent internet poll suggested
that three quarters of them wanted Robson to be removed from his
post, but even they will be surprised at the timing of the departure.
The media, on the other hand, have been generally critical of Jeremy
Peace's decision, feeling that eight games into a new season is
hardly enough time for the manager to prove himself, particularly
when the team lies just five points from the top of the table.
On the face of it, this stance seems reasonable. Twelve points from
eight games is hardly disastrous and, having apparently been backed
in the summer, one could sensibly argue that Robson deserved more
time. But in my view, the reality of the situation is not as clear
cut.
It is important to realise, however, that the vast majority of journalists
who have taken this stance are not regulars at the Hawthorns and
have probably seen only a handful of Albion games in the last nine
months. Two who do not fall into this category are the BBC's Adrian
Chiles, and Chris Lepkowski of the Birmingham Evening Mail. Their
comments are somewhat different to the majority of their journalistic
colleagues.
Adrian
Chiles' article pretty much sums up my own feelings on the situation.
I wanted Bryan Robson to succeed but, since the turn of the year,
results simply haven't been good enough.
Chris
Lepkowski's article goes into more detail about Robson's reign
and highlights why the fans have become ever more frustrated with
his management.
I backed Robson consistently through last season. My view was that,
after the miracle of the Great Escape, he deserved a full season
to prove his ability to take the team forward. I saw glimpses of
the excellent football we all crave in the victories over Manchester
City and Tottenham Hotspur in the closing weeks of 2005, and that
was enough for me to pen my support
for him when the calls started for him to be sacked in January.
But the way in which the team collapsed to relegation with a whimper,
picking up just four points from the last thirteen games, was, in
my opinion, enough to get any manager the sack.
It is true that Robson was not the sole guilty party, and maybe
that is why he didn't go in the summer. The players certainly did
not perform to the best of their ability, and Jeremy Peace must
take some, if not most, of the blame for the debacle in the January
transfer window which left the side crucially short of strikers.
However, the squad that Robson had at his disposal last season was
surely good enough to keep the club in the Premiership.
Other than the odd injury, Robson had three strikers at his disposal,
four if you include Nicholson, but chose to play the oldest and
slowest of them, Kevin Campbell, on his own for many games, and
the most talented, Kanu, was criminally under-used. Why, in the
must-win games against Villa, Bolton and Newcastle in the closing
stages of the season did he start with his skipper as the only recognised
striker, a ploy which had failed to produce a win all season? In
every match Albion won in 2005-06, they started with two recognised
strikers.
The manner in which the team surrendered their Premiership status
was enough to see Robson lose his job, in my opinion. Jeremy Peace
decided to give him another chance, and I felt that I should do
the same.
Peace's tight wage budget may have denied Robson the services of
Kanu, David Thompson and Danny Shittu, but the squad is far superior
to most in the Championship, with Birmingham City the only club
that can be compared in terms of quality. And yet the team has struggled
to beat inferior opposition and produced a thoroughly inept display
against Sunderland. Performances since then may have been slightly
improved, but if the club are to be promoted this season, it looks
like something more radical is required, and I do not believe that
Robson is capable of producing it.
This season alone would certainly not be enough to get a manager
sacked, but when coupled with the second half to the last campaign,
it is far more understandable. Chris Lepkowski summed up in his
article how the club has changed since the Great Escape when he
said "As someone who has reported exclusively on Albion for
a longer time than most, I've watched what was an ambitious club
drained of all colour, spark and enthusiasm.
He goes on to say that it does not have to be permanent.
Robson was a great player for Albion, Manchester United and England,
but the jury remains unconvinced as to his abilities as a manager.
As I have already said, I wanted him to succeed, but I want Albion
to succeed more, and I believe the time was right for a change.
All Albion fans will remember the Great Escape, and I thank Robson
for that experience, and I wish him all the best for the future.
But it is now time to look forward to the next era at the Hawthorns.
At the time of writing, Steve Cotterill is the favourite to succeed
Robson on a permanent basis, and I would welcome that appointment.
The choice of a new manager is never easy, and there is always a
risk, but I would prefer to see a young hungry manager with something
to prove than a more experienced one that has failed more times
than he's succeeded.
I hope that Mr Peace and the board make the right appointment quickly,
and we can look forward to the rest of what will hopefully be a
successful season.
Jon Want, 20th September 2006
|